Talk:Melee Weapon Template - Revision history

imported>Tlosk: Talk:Melee Weapon Stat Template moved to Talk:Melee Weapon Template: naming normalization

2009-04-07T16:53:06Z

Talk:Melee Weapon Stat Template moved to Talk:Melee Weapon Template: naming normalization

← Older revision	Revision as of 11:53, 7 April 2009
(No difference)

imported>An Adventurer: /* Special Properties vs Categories */

2009-02-04T17:52:25Z

Special Properties vs Categories

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:52, 4 February 2009
Line 87:		Line 87:

	Those would all be categories as well right? --[[User:Atarax\|Atarax]] 11:43, 4 February 2009 (CST)		Those would all be categories as well right? --[[User:Atarax\|Atarax]] 11:43, 4 February 2009 (CST)


			:Currently, Resistance Cleaving and Rending do not have categories for each element. Instead, any weapon with a rending/cleaving is tagged with just Rending/Resistance Cleaving as the category, while in the special property listings, the whole property is created into a link. This way, the Rending or Resistance Cleaving category page will will list every weapon of every element, and the individual element pages are listed so you can click them and view the whatlinkshere. See [[:Category:Resistance Cleaving]] and [[:Category:Rending]]. --[[User:An Adventurer\|An Adventurer]] 11:52, 4 February 2009 (CST)

imported>Atarax: /* Special Properties vs Categories */

2009-02-04T17:46:17Z

Special Properties vs Categories

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:46, 4 February 2009
Line 82:		Line 82:
	== Special Properties vs Categories ==		== Special Properties vs Categories ==

	Question: Are all of the [[Special Properties]] actually categories? If so, is there an easy way to list the special properties and have it automatically add the article to those respective categories? I noticed that, for the most part, all special properties have their own categories. For consistency, it would be cool if we could automatically handle the category assignment to avoid any user error. The same concept would go for all items, weapons, casters, and armor as well. ~~--[[User~~:~~Atarax\|Atarax]] 11:43, 4 February 2009 (CST)~~		Question: Are all of the [[Special Properties]] actually categories? If so, is there an easy way to list the special properties and have it automatically add the article to those respective categories? I noticed that, for the most part, all special properties have their own categories. For consistency, it would be cool if we could automatically handle the category assignment to avoid any user error. The same concept would go for all items, weapons, casters, and armor as well. See this for example:

	Special Properties: Crushing Blow\|Biting Strike\|Attuned\|Bonded\|Ivoryable\|Cast on Strike\|Resistance Cleaving: Slashing		Special Properties: Crushing Blow\|Biting Strike\|Attuned\|Bonded\|Ivoryable\|Cast on Strike\|Resistance Cleaving: Slashing

	Those would all be categories as well right?		Those would all be categories as well right? --[[User:Atarax\|Atarax]] 11:43, 4 February 2009 (CST)

imported>Atarax: /* Special Properties vs Categories */

2009-02-04T17:46:01Z

Special Properties vs Categories

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:46, 4 February 2009
Line 82:		Line 82:
	== Special Properties vs Categories ==		== Special Properties vs Categories ==

	Question: Are all of the [[Special Properties]] actually categories? If so, is there an easy way to list the special properties and have it automatically add the article to those respective categories? I noticed that, for the most part, all special properties have their own categories. For consistency, it would be cool if we could automatically handle the category assignment to avoid any user error. --[[User:Atarax\|Atarax]] 11:43, 4 February 2009 (CST)		Question: Are all of the [[Special Properties]] actually categories? If so, is there an easy way to list the special properties and have it automatically add the article to those respective categories? I noticed that, for the most part, all special properties have their own categories. For consistency, it would be cool if we could automatically handle the category assignment to avoid any user error. The same concept would go for all items, weapons, casters, and armor as well. --[[User:Atarax\|Atarax]] 11:43, 4 February 2009 (CST)

			Special Properties: Crushing Blow\|Biting Strike\|Attuned\|Bonded\|Ivoryable\|Cast on Strike\|Resistance Cleaving: Slashing

			Those would all be categories as well right?

imported>Atarax at 17:44, 4 February 2009

2009-02-04T17:44:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:44, 4 February 2009
Line 80:		Line 80:
	: I agree that looks nice for multiple versions, I think I've fixed all the phantom line breaks so it will display correctly. --[[User:Tlosk\|Tlosk]] 06:14, 4 February 2009 (CST)		: I agree that looks nice for multiple versions, I think I've fixed all the phantom line breaks so it will display correctly. --[[User:Tlosk\|Tlosk]] 06:14, 4 February 2009 (CST)

	~~----~~		== Special Properties vs Categories ==

	Question: Are all of the [[Special Properties]] actually categories? If so, is there an easy way to list the special properties and have it automatically add the article to those respective categories? I noticed that, for the most part, all special properties have their own categories. For consistency, it would be cool if we could automatically handle the category assignment to avoid any user error. --[[User:Atarax\|Atarax]] 11:43, 4 February 2009 (CST)		Question: Are all of the [[Special Properties]] actually categories? If so, is there an easy way to list the special properties and have it automatically add the article to those respective categories? I noticed that, for the most part, all special properties have their own categories. For consistency, it would be cool if we could automatically handle the category assignment to avoid any user error. --[[User:Atarax\|Atarax]] 11:43, 4 February 2009 (CST)

imported>Atarax at 17:43, 4 February 2009

2009-02-04T17:43:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:43, 4 February 2009
Line 79:		Line 79:

	: I agree that looks nice for multiple versions, I think I've fixed all the phantom line breaks so it will display correctly. --[[User:Tlosk\|Tlosk]] 06:14, 4 February 2009 (CST)		: I agree that looks nice for multiple versions, I think I've fixed all the phantom line breaks so it will display correctly. --[[User:Tlosk\|Tlosk]] 06:14, 4 February 2009 (CST)

			----

			Question: Are all of the [[Special Properties]] actually categories? If so, is there an easy way to list the special properties and have it automatically add the article to those respective categories? I noticed that, for the most part, all special properties have their own categories. For consistency, it would be cool if we could automatically handle the category assignment to avoid any user error. --[[User:Atarax\|Atarax]] 11:43, 4 February 2009 (CST)

imported>Tlosk at 12:14, 4 February 2009

2009-02-04T12:14:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:14, 4 February 2009
Line 78:		Line 78:
	\|}		\|}

	: I agree that looks nice for multiple versions, I think I've fixed all the ~~breaking issues~~ so it will display correctly. --[[User:Tlosk\|Tlosk]] 06:14, 4 February 2009 (CST)		: I agree that looks nice for multiple versions, I think I've fixed all the phantom line breaks so it will display correctly. --[[User:Tlosk\|Tlosk]] 06:14, 4 February 2009 (CST)

imported>Tlosk at 12:14, 4 February 2009

2009-02-04T12:14:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:14, 4 February 2009
Line 11:		Line 11:
	{\|cellpadding=2		{\|cellpadding=2
	!align=center\| Current Version \|\| Retired Version		!align=center\| Current Version \|\| Retired Version
	\|-		\|-valign=top
	\|valign=top\|		\|
	{{Melee Weapon		{{Melee Weapon
	\| Weapon Type =		\| Weapon Type =
Line 44:		Line 44:
	\| Mana Cost =		\| Mana Cost =
	}}		}}
	~~\|valign=top~~\|		\|
	{{Melee Weapon		{{Melee Weapon
	\| Weapon Type =		\| Weapon Type =
	\| Name =		\| Name = Corndog Sword
	\| Value =		\| Value = 15
	\| Burden =		\| Burden = 200
	\| Icon Image = Icon.png		\| Icon Image = Icon.png
	\| Live Image = Live.jpg		\| Live Image = Live.jpg
Line 55:		Line 55:
	\| Description =		\| Description =
	\| Special Properties =		\| Special Properties =
	\| Damage =		\| Damage = 25 - 85
	\| Buffed Damage =		\| Buffed Damage =
	\| Element =		\| Element = Slashing
	\| Speed =		\| Speed = 10
	\| Buffed Speed =		\| Buffed Speed =
	\| Bonus to Attack =		\| Bonus to Attack = 5
	\| Buffed Attack =		\| Buffed Attack = 5
	\| Bonus to Defense =		\| Bonus to Defense =
	\| Buffed Defense =		\| Buffed Defense =
Line 77:		Line 77:
	}}		}}
	\|}		\|}

			: I agree that looks nice for multiple versions, I think I've fixed all the breaking issues so it will display correctly. --[[User:Tlosk\|Tlosk]] 06:14, 4 February 2009 (CST)

imported>An Adventurer at 05:21, 4 February 2009

2009-02-04T05:21:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:21, 4 February 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	can this wiki template handle multiple "ID panel" tabels placed within an invisible table, like my entry for [[Crystal Sword]] and other multi-version same-name items? If so, looks great to me. EDIT: Yeah, looks like it can.		can this wiki template handle multiple "ID panel" tabels placed within an invisible table, like my entry for [[Crystal Sword]] and other multi-version same-name items? If so, looks great to me. EDIT: Yeah, looks like it can.

	However I see some issues with it now. There are many weapons, especially older quest weapons, that have no spells. All store weapons have no description, along with a few quest weapons. Looks like when a field is left blank it leaves a line there. --[[User:An Adventurer\|An Adventurer]] 23:19, 3 February 2009 (CST)		However I see some issues with it now. There are many weapons, especially older quest weapons, that have no spells (edit, again, I see there is a no magic template). All store weapons have no description, along with a few quest weapons. Looks like when a field is left blank it leaves a line there. --[[User:An Adventurer\|An Adventurer]] 23:19, 3 February 2009 (CST)

	{{Intro		{{Intro

imported>An Adventurer at 05:19, 4 February 2009

2009-02-04T05:19:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:19, 4 February 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	can this wiki template handle multiple "ID panel" tabels placed within an invisible table, like my entry for [[Crystal Sword]] and other multi-version same-name items? If so, looks great to me. ~~--[[User~~:~~An Adventurer\|An Adventurer]] 20:19~~, ~~3 February 2009 (CST)~~		can this wiki template handle multiple "ID panel" tabels placed within an invisible table, like my entry for [[Crystal Sword]] and other multi-version same-name items? If so, looks great to me. EDIT: Yeah, looks like it can.

	~~::Yeah~~, ~~looks~~ like it ~~can. Template works for me~~. --[[User:An Adventurer\|An Adventurer]] 23:14, 3 February 2009 (CST)		However I see some issues with it now. There are many weapons, especially older quest weapons, that have no spells. All store weapons have no description, along with a few quest weapons. Looks like when a field is left blank it leaves a line there. --[[User:An Adventurer\|An Adventurer]] 23:19, 3 February 2009 (CST)

	{{Intro		{{Intro
Line 15:		Line 15:
	{{Melee Weapon		{{Melee Weapon
	\| Weapon Type =		\| Weapon Type =
	\| Name =		\| Name = Corndog Sword
	\| Value =		\| Value = 1
	\| Burden =		\| Burden = 2
	\| Icon Image = Icon.png		\| Icon Image = Icon.png
	\| Live Image = Live.jpg		\| Live Image = Live.jpg
Line 23:		Line 23:
	\| Description =		\| Description =
	\| Special Properties =		\| Special Properties =
	\| Damage =		\| Damage = 1 - 2
	\| Buffed Damage =		\| Buffed Damage =
	\| Element =		\| Element = Fire
	\| Speed =		\| Speed = 10
	\| Buffed Speed =		\| Buffed Speed =
	\| Bonus to Attack =		\| Bonus to Attack = 10
	\| Buffed Attack =		\| Buffed Attack =
	\| Bonus to Defense =		\| Bonus to Defense = 10
	\| Buffed Defense =		\| Buffed Defense =
	\| Bonus to Missile =		\| Bonus to Missile =